🔥 Maharashtra may allow offshore casinos - The Economic Times

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 💰

Filter:

Active

Free bonus

Sort:

Newest

Popular

According to the Constitution, legislatures of the states are empowered to frame laws on the subject. Chess icon Anand returns home after over three months.{/INSERTKEYS}{/PARAGRAPH} Lotteries, on the other hand, are within the purview of the central government and have been specifically excluded from gambling rules. The Act contemplates a licensing regime for casinos and attempts to exempt casino games both skill and chance-based from the application of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act. The Supreme Court observed that as the petition had been withdrawn, the observations made by the high court would not survive. The six-month time limit allowed by the court lapsed on April 9 without any decision being made, though there have been considerable deliberations by all the relevant departments. But, before the court could adjudicate conclusively, the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the original petition, which was accepted. Jay Sayta, a researcher in gambling laws and founder of GLaws. Considering the situation, there is an urgent need for the Maharashtra government to come up with a concrete decision on the four-decade issue of legalising casinos in the region. Print this article. Maharashtra to take a call. In Gangtok. The Act prohibits the formation of common gaming houses which includes houses on vessels and makes betting and wagering except on horse and dog racing in such houses illegal. The Act punishes formation of illegal gaming houses with imprisonment up to two years and penalises those found in illegal gaming houses with imprisonment of up to six months, in addition to fines in both cases. Development of casino infrastructure and an effective gambling regulation scheme has potential for large-scale revenue generation, while simultaneously curtailing the movement of black money and controlling criminal and underworld networks that operate in an unregulated industry. India gets its first live casino! The current judicial perspective on what constitutes gambling is also yet to be settled for each individual circumstance. India, China hold talks with 'positive' approach. In Maharashtra, the relevant statute is the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, , modelled after the central legislation. Any move to legalise casinos is unlikely to be smooth, with certain sections in the administrative machinery at loggerheads over the proposal. {PARAGRAPH}{INSERTKEYS}T he Maharashtra government will soon decide whether to allow casinos to function in the state. The government has already received two proposals assuring over Rs 1, crore Rs 10 billion a year to the exchequer if it operationalises a legislation to make offshore casinos legal. At present, no other game apart from rummy has been tested against the principle of skill versus chance. The Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation has now taken the initiative to push the proposal down government channels, citing huge potential boosts to tourism and substantial revenue generation. The initial proposal envisages a Goa-like model of offshore casinos on yachts, only accessible to foreigners and run by the state government. Get Rediff News in your Inbox: email. The sequence of affairs, though, renders the position of law relating to skilled-based games still uncertain. Even the Supreme Court judgment has been subject to varying interpretations. Kejriwal warns hospitals on 'black-marketing' of beds. The Bombay HC, while hearing a petition last year on the delay in notifying the Casinos Act, directed the government to take a stand on the issue within six months. In fact, the Madras High Court had in interpreted the Satyanarayana judgment differently, and adjudicated that playing rummy with stakes would constitute gambling. Further, the Act does not even require the prosecuting authority to prove the alleged gaming was for monetary gain. The legal position of other such games is still uncertain. The court, in that particular case, was evaluating the card game of rummy and opined that this did not constitute gambling, as it involved a significant preponderance of skill. The Public Gambling Act, , has been adopted by certain states. The issue once again reached the Supreme Court. The proposal also contemplates eventually allowing citizens to avail of the facilities, as well as privatisation of the entities if the venture proves successful. Others have framed their own.